Both topics I want to integrate Hegel’s dialectics to explore two extreme sides of each environmental issue (thesis and antithesis) as well as a (not necessarily) finalized solution (synthesis) to the environmental problems addressed. Option A: Overgrazing Context: environmental damage done by overgrazing and animal ethics Disruption: hundred years ago, human stopped starving cuz livestocks now, go vegetarian/vegan? Response: overgrazing != improper grazing. We need regulations and the system to change Option B: Energy Context: pollution done by fossil fuels, continuous use of fossil fuels permissible? We need an alternative -- green energy. Disruption: rising green energy solutions are not going to save humans. Response: green energy is not the ultimate and efficient alternative solution. Human beings need a combination of both, taking advantage of our resources wisely.