I think you could give some counter arguments for why zoos should exist to make your argument stronger and then debunk that argument. For example, I think I read an article about Zoos using animals to make scientific breakthroughs using their genetic material and biological data. You can maybe use this counter argument onto your paper and then debunk it.
Your topic towards the ethics of animal zoo was interesting. Your stand point of believing animals can't be treated like an item for viewing and commercial purpose was evident. It might be better if you narrow the viewpoint by specifying whether your focus is on the caging and abusing behavior towards animals or the animal zoo itself.
I think you could give some counter arguments for why zoos should exist to make your argument stronger and then debunk that argument. For example, I think I read an article about Zoos using animals to make scientific breakthroughs using their genetic material and biological data. You can maybe use this counter argument onto your paper and then debunk it.
Your topic towards the ethics of animal zoo was interesting. Your stand point of believing animals can't be treated like an item for viewing and commercial purpose was evident. It might be better if you narrow the viewpoint by specifying whether your focus is on the caging and abusing behavior towards animals or the animal zoo itself.