Regarding Autonomy I personally believe it is not something we get inherently rather we have been given through laws and the constitutional laws and freedoms. However I do not agree that a person's autonomy should be taken if they intefere with others autonomy rather they should be punished but I do not believe a peron's rights should be taken away from them. The more we supress humans the greater they will revolt.

The topic of your paper is very impressive! Indeed, the premise of individual autonomy is overall security. As the purpose of human development and survival, freedom and autonomy are based on appropriate rules. Just as the concept of autonomy was also defined by us humans after our survival in society. Perhaps as a society, we need these rules to ensure more people have the opportunity for autonomy. If a small number of people cause interference with the autonomy of other individuals in society due to long-term mistakes, their right to autonomy should be revoked as a warning. The more developed humanity becomes, the more we can moderately introduce some rules to help those who make mistakes regain autonomy, but the prerequisite is that it does not harm the autonomy of others.

I know you skipped some of the content during your presentation and the class didn't get to touch upon it. The central question: Whether autonomy is inherent or imposed? I would say it's imposed because laws, norms, education, and culture shape our autonomy more than anything. For example, you're not really autonomous if the law doesn't permit it, so in reality, you don't really have the right to govern yourself. The law does. This is just an example of how you can incorporate it into your argument.